Tag Archive for 'Billie Jean King'

Broken records

Tennis keeps making history this summer.

First in June there was the infamous Isner-Mahut match that went on for a staggering 11 hours and 5 minutes at Wimbledon defying all previous historic matches. Shame now they have the roof on Centre Court, BBC will never get to replay the Isner-Mahut match like they did the 1969 Gonzales-Pasarell  encounter, coming in a mere 5 hours 12 minutes.

Then this month in July there has been the attempt at the King Baudouin Stadium in Brussels to break the record for the largest audience at a tennis match.

The previous record held by Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs was a monumental exhibition in more ways than one.

It was referred to as the Battle of the Sexes in 1973 when King took on the challenge from male chauvinist Riggs who believed that the women’s game was inferior to the men’s. A 1939 Wimbledon Champion, Riggs claimed he could beat the current top player’s in the women’s game even though he was retired by some decades.

Pomp & Ceremony - Billie Jean King arrives like a Queen in Houston 1973

The exhibition was played at the Houston Astrodome in Texas, USA in front of then record 30, 492 spectators and a massive worldwide TV audience estimated at 50 million people across 37 countries. (FYI: Rod Laver Arena, Melbourne 16,820; Court Philippe Chatrier, Paris 15,166; Centre Court, Wimbledon 15,000; Arthur Ashe Stadium, New York 22,547).

King entered the Astrodome Cleopatra style, carried aloft in a chair held by four bare-chested muscle men dressed in the garb of ancient slaves. Riggs followed in a rickshaw drawn by a bevy of gorgeous scantily-clad models.

The final score? King beat Riggs 6-4 6-3 6-3. This was a huge leap for women’s tennis helping it to gain worldwide recognition and respect thanks to Billie Jean’s persistent and determination to win the match for all womankind.

The 2010 Battle of the Belgians hasn’t had the same global following as perhaps hoped for. Belgian’s tennis stars Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin were to play off on home soil and given their previous head to heads, it was likely to be a battle indeed.

The event turned out a bit of a disaster (title billing wise) when Henin had to pull out due to injury sustained at Wimbledon (ironically during her fourth round encounter with Clijsters).

Step in Wimbledon Champion Miss Serena Williams which considering her dramatic and controversial US Open Semi final clash last summer with Kim Clijsters, this 8th July exhibition could have been billed as a grudge match on Kim’s back yard.

Serena Williams, smiles as she poses with Belgium's Kim Clijsters, Italy's Francesca Schiavone and Martina Navratilova in Brussels, Thursday July 8, 2010

However the energy and mental toughness that it takes to win a Slam bore on Serena and she was not able to give her best performance and a lack-lustre 6-3 6-2 score saw Kim victorious once again over Serena.

Could they not have even played best of 5 sets to make things interesting and a bit longer for the fans? Despite the scoreline, with 5,189 extra spectators than the Battle of the Sexes, a new world record was written in Brussels. 

The world’s media, albeit still in World Cup fever, did not ignite this story to the level the Battle of the Sexes created 37 years ago. In one sense, it is a shame that historic match now loses its world record status to a match that wasn’t even what it was supposed to be billed as.

BJK remains a strong stalwart of women’s tennis saluting the magnificence of Serena’s talent during a BBC interview at Wimbledon but one wonders what she really thought of this match up in Belgium. My research for this post showed that BJK was supposed to be the chair umpire but reports and pics from the match revealed that Martina Navratilova kept score.

With the rules in women’s tennis only allowing best of 3 sets, its highly unlikely mathematically that we’ll ever see a women’s match make or even break Isner-Mahut’s record. At least Women’s tennis can hold their own in the world record books for audience figures.

Who said women’s tennis wasn’t popular? 35, 681 in Brussels were true fans. Go girl Power!!

Right Royal Rant

I’ve had to go for a walk to cool down. I’ve just read the scheduling for tomorrow at Wimbledon and I ain’t a happy tennis fan.

First a word about the history that was made today at the Championships before I talk about tomorrow’s historic visit by a certain someone…

Mahut & Isner will now go down in the tennis history books for a number of reasons. Their match, which has yet to finish tied at 59-59 games all in the final set, has caught the attention beyond the tennis world as they battled out on court 18 for a place in the second round. Such is their passion, desire to win and fitness levels; neither has relented in a match that has broken all previous records.

Tomorrow they will resume at some stage to, one hopes, finish their epic encounter. It will be one of those occasions where it is tough to have a loser but that is the tennis for you and someone has to.

Speaking on the BBC, John McEnroe hailed it as the best thing to promote tennis above and beyond any finals matches. These guys gave it their all and unlike the World Cup, they cannot substitute anyone else to play for them or finish with a quick penalty shoot out.

So, tomorrow the Queen, Elizabeth II will arrive at Wimbledon for the first time since 1977.

What an occasion for the tournament organisers, fans, players and the media. Planned or not, Andy Murray’s half of the draw is scheduled to play and as such, he will open up Centre Court proceedings.

It’s been the talk of the tournament so far with excitement building for this right royal occasion. So what have I got to rant about? Serena Williams, the defending champion and top seed and world number one and winner of 3 titles here, is down to play on, wait for it, number 2 court!

Not Centre, despite Serena’s most public cheery updates on how she has been perfecting her curtsy for all the world to hear.

Not Court number 1 where men’s defending champion Roger Federer played today, no no, number 2 court, the third showcourt at SW19.

Now speaking as someone who on two occasions won ballot tickets for that very same court (when it was the old graveyard court beside the Millennium Centre), I do not for one second dismiss the fact that those ticket holders will have a real honour seeing Serena play. I would be super happy if I was in London right now with court 2 tickets for the morning.

My annoyance lies in the attitude and pure sexist mindset of the organisers to put the female champion on court 2 and never for one fleeting moment even consider a) putting Roger Federer or b) Andy Murray on court 2 at ANY stage of the tournament.

Five times champion Venus Williams is also subject to regular Court 2 appearances and this is totally acceptable ONLY IF the same is considered for Federer, six times champion, to play a match on that very same court. It only seems fair, right?

Imagine your delight if you got court 2 tickets and the Fed Express rocked up to play in front of your very eyes? Well don’t get too excited because there’s as much chance of that happening as there is a player wearing a purple and orange dress hoisting the Venus Rosewater Dish on Centre Court.

Wimbledon scheduling has been an area of frustration for me over the years, but this really does take the biscuit. I cannot believe how they are treating the former champions in the women’s game. If I were Serena Williams, I would be calling a meeting with the referee and/or WTA to pull them about this ridiculous and unfair decision.

Wimbledon may offer equal prize money, but they obviously have a bit to go regarding scheduling equality. One wonders what tennis legend Billie Jean King thinks about this…